Where You Live Shapes Your Finances

I recently spoke with a woman in her 30s who was trying to decide where to move next. She had spent an important chapter of her life on the West Coast, primarily in San Francisco. Then, following changes in both a relationship and her work, she relocated to New Hampshire. The move brought her closer to family and friends and gave her a renewed sense of home. But it also seemed to narrow her economic and social world. Although she could work remotely, she felt disconnected from the professional relationships and informal networks that often create opportunity. She is now working toward a move to New York City—not only to reinvigorate her social life, but also to improve her economic prospects.

Recent research suggests that her instincts may be right—perhaps more than she realizes.

Pay Attention to the Magic of Agglomeration

Economists sometimes refer to the “magic of agglomeration.” The idea is that when talented people, growing businesses, specialized services and capital cluster in one place, they make one another more productive. Employees learn from colleagues. Employers gain access to deeper pools of talent. Ideas travel more quickly. People change jobs more easily without having to uproot their lives. Chance encounters can lead to new clients, partnerships or careers.

Some cities simply attract people who were already likely to earn high incomes. Other cities actually appear to increase what comparable workers earn. That distinction matters.

Place May Matter More than Talent

A recent study examined the job histories of more than 500 million LinkedIn users, tracking how compensation changed as white-collar workers moved among cities. The researchers estimated that place itself accounts for between 45% and 73% of the wage gap between cities within the same country. The rest can be attributed to differences among the individuals who live there. In other words, where you live does not merely reflect your economic opportunities. It can help create them.

The Economist developed an interactive tool illustrating the potential wage effect of moving between more than 300 cities. One comparison in the article shows that moving from Montpellier, Vermont to New York City is associated with a near doubling in wages based on the location premium alone. The precise result will vary by city, profession and individual. Still, the broader implication is difficult to ignore: for someone in the early stages of a career, a change in place can have an enormous cumulative effect.

A higher salary this year can lead to a higher starting point for the next job, greater retirement contributions, more opportunities to invest and a larger professional network. Compounded over several decades, the financial difference can become substantial.

Of course, many of the places offering higher wages also have higher costs of living. Housing in New York or San Francisco is hardly inexpensive. But in some cases, the wage difference is so significant that it can overwhelm the difference in everyday expenses. For younger adults with decades of work ahead, moving to a place with strong economic momentum may therefore be one of the most consequential financial decisions they make—provided they can manage the immediate challenge of higher housing and lifestyle costs.

Economic Momentum in Places Matter in the 2nd Half of Life, Too

The financial rubric changes later in life, but perhaps not as much as we assume.

Pre-retirees and retirees often begin their search for a new place by looking for a lower cost of living. That is understandable. Yet a place that is inexpensive today may carry less visible costs tomorrow. Economically thriving communities are more likely to have appreciating assets, active real-estate markets and the tax base necessary to support infrastructure, health care and services for older adults.

A low-cost community may offer an affordable house but a thin labor market. Finding home-care workers, contractors, drivers or medical specialists may be difficult. When workers are scarce, services can paradoxically become both less available and more expensive. Selling a home may also take longer in a place with limited population or job growth.

With people living longer, moving at 60 or 65 may not be a ten-year decision. It may be a 25- or 30-year bet on the future of a community. Economic momentum deserves a place alongside housing costs, climate, proximity to family and quality of life.

One particularly interesting category includes cities with growing, diversified economies located in states that do not impose an individual income tax. Nashville, Austin and Miami are prominent examples. Each offers a significant economic base while Tennessee, Texas and Florida levy no state tax on individual income. That does not automatically make them inexpensive, nor does it mean they are right for everyone. But they illustrate how economic opportunity and tax policy can interact in ways that strengthen long-term financial well-being.

Courage to Make a Change May Be More than Worth It Financially

Place matters. That does not diminish the importance of our individual talents, education or effort. It simply recognizes that our gifts are expressed within an environment and some environments provide far more opportunities for those gifts to be noticed, developed and rewarded.

Choose your place wisely. For some people, the move to New York or Nashville cannot happen soon enough.

‍